Generative AI team tracing responses to blank source-evidence cards

AI & Automation service

Generative AI

Build governed language-model workflows that help people find, interpret, and create information within defined knowledge and access boundaries.

Service context

Generative AI should be designed as part of a workflow, not added as an open-ended chat layer. We identify the task, the source material, the user decision, and the point at which human review remains necessary.

The solution can combine retrieval, model routing, prompt and tool controls, evaluation datasets, and usage telemetry while respecting the permissions already attached to enterprise information.

Problems addressed

  1. 01

    Teams experiment with public tools while sensitive information, access boundaries, and retention expectations remain unclear.

  2. 02

    Answers sound plausible but lack citations, reliable retrieval, or an evaluation set tied to the intended task.

  3. 03

    A prototype cannot be operated because cost, latency, permissions, failure handling, and content change have not been designed together.

Engagement approach

01

Define a bounded workflow and evaluation set before selecting models, retrieval patterns, or interface behavior.

02

Preserve source permissions through ingestion and retrieval, then expose citations and uncertainty where users need to verify output.

03

Instrument quality, latency, cost, user feedback, and failure modes so the service can be changed through evidence rather than intuition.

TECHNOLOGY CONTEXTOpenAI API
TECHNOLOGY CONTEXTAzure AI
TECHNOLOGY CONTEXTLangChain
TECHNOLOGY CONTEXTPostgreSQL

Delivery stages

  1. 01

    Bound

    Select the workflow, users, knowledge sources, access rules, and review responsibilities.

  2. 02

    Evaluate

    Create representative questions, expected evidence, failure cases, and acceptance measures.

  3. 03

    Integrate

    Build retrieval, orchestration, interface, and tool connections around existing permissions.

  4. 04

    Govern

    Monitor quality, cost, latency, source change, user feedback, and approved model updates.

Technology context

OpenAI API

Azure AI

LangChain

PostgreSQL

Value direction

These are intended operating improvements, not guaranteed results.

  • Faster access to relevant internal knowledge with a visible path back to the underlying source material.
  • A reusable evaluation harness for comparing prompts, retrieval changes, and model options over time.
  • Clear access, retention, and review controls suited to the information and workflow in scope.
  • An operating view of adoption, quality, latency, and cost instead of an unmeasured conversational prototype.

Decision questions

Start a conversation

Bring the system context into the first conversation.